Biological evolution is supposed to be a blind, purposeless process without any foresight. So how did so many of the same highly complex features evolve repeatedly and independently by random mutations ?
Moreover, evolutionary biologists claim, that once a complex trait has been lost in evolution, it cannot be regained (Dollo’s law of irreversibility). Yet, there are many examples where Dollo’s law has been violated repeatedly … (e.g. shell coiling, lizards oviparity and so on … )
For those who disagree and insist that evolution is not a random process (e.g. “Natural Selection” is not random), let’s not forget, that a series of RANDOM mutations ( which creates the same highly complex traits over and over again ) has to occur in the first place — and then “Natural Selection” may or may not select it. In other words, random mutations design species. All what “Natural Selection” can do is to “approve” good or bad design generated by random mutations.
But, there is another problem … Examples of bad designs are non-existing. Considering there are 10,000,000 kinds of species on Earth (as of 2024), how many examples of allegedly bad-design features did biologists actually find ? 5 ? or 10 ? Out of all those 10,000,000 highly complex design systems ?
I, as the author of this blog, completely agree with Dr. Randy Guliuzza (ICR): “Convergent evolution is the fabricated conjecture evolutionists invoke to explain very similar characteristics between creatures that could not have been inherited from a common ancestor and that evolutionists will never accept as having been produced by an intelligently designed internal programming that is specified for common purposes”