From PNAS.ORG:
These results illustrate exactly
why arthropod compound eye evolution has remained controversial,
because one of two seemingly very unlikely evolutionary
histories must be true. Either compound eyes with detailed similarities
evolved multiple times in different arthropod groups or
compound eyes have been lost in a seemingly inordinate number
of arthropod lineages
http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/99/3/1426.full.pdf
These scientists even admit that all this stuff is very unlikely to happen … ( it looks like there is something very very wrong with the evolutionary theory )